Abstract

DesignThis is a cross-sectional study. SettingUniversity research laboratory. ParticipantsFifteen healthy adults (mean age: 27.47 years) volunteered for this study. InterventionThe individuals performed standard bridge exercise and modified bridge exercises with right leg-lift (single-leg-lift bridge exercise, single-leg-lift bridge exercise on an unstable surface, and single-leg-lift hip abduction bridge exercise). Main outcome measuresDuring the bridge exercises, electromyography of the rectus abdominis, internal oblique, erector spinae, and multifidus muscles was recorded using a wireless surface electromyography system. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (exercise by side) with post hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction was used to compare the electromyography data collected from each muscle. ResultsBilateral internal oblique muscle activities showed significantly greater during single-leg-lift bridge exercise (95% confidence interval: right internal oblique=−8.99 to −1.08, left internal oblique=−6.84 to −0.10), single-leg-lift bridge exercise on an unstable surface (95% confidence interval: right internal oblique=−7.32 to −1.78, left internal oblique=−5.34 to −0.99), and single-leg-lift hip abduction bridge exercise (95% confidence interval: right internal oblique=−17.13 to −0.89, left internal oblique=−8.56 to −0.60) compared with standard bridge exercise. Bilateral rectus abdominis showed greater electromyography activity during single-leg-lift bridge exercise on an unstable surface (95% confidence interval: right rectus abdominis=−9.33 to −1.13, left rectus abdominis=−4.80 to −0.64) and single-leg-lift hip abduction bridge exercise (95% confidence interval: right rectus abdominis=−14.12 to −1.84, left rectus abdominis=−6.68 to −0.16) compared with standard bridge exercise. In addition, the right rectus abdominis muscle activity was greater during single-leg-lift hip abduction bridge exercise compared with single-leg-lift bridge exercise on an unstable surface (95% confidence interval=−7.51 to −0.89). For erector spinae, muscle activity was greater in right side compared with left side during all exercises (95% confidence interval: standard bridge exercise=0.19–4.53, single-leg-lift bridge exercise=0.24–10.49, single-leg-lift bridge exercise on an unstable surface=0.74–8.55, single-leg-lift hip abduction bridge exercise=0.47–11.43). There was no significant interaction and main effect for multifidus. ConclusionsAdding hip abduction and unstable conditions to bridge exercises may be useful strategy to facilitate the co-activation of trunk muscles.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call