Abstract

Background: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of selected cephalosporins and carbapenems against Enterobacteriaceae have been revised by major guidelines including CLSI and EUCAST mainly according to available pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. A decrease of breakpoint may obviate the need to detect specific resistance mechanisms such as extended-spectrum �-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase, which may be less correlated to treatment outcome than does the actual MIC of each agent. Objective: To analyze cephalosporin and carbapenem MIC distributions among ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae at a university hospital against revised interpretative breakpoints. Methods: MIC distributions of selected cephalosporins and carbapenems among 505 isolates of genotypically confirmed ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were determined by E-test TM method and analyzed according to interpretative breakpoints comparing between CLSI and EUCAST guidelines. Results: ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae demonstrated a wide range of cephalosporin MIC ( 64). Up to 9.7% of isolates displayed MIC lower than a revised cephalosporin breakpoint. Most isolates remained susceptible to imipenem and meropenem while as high as 24.6% were not susceptible to ertapenem. Lowered breakpoints may result in a change in categorical interpretations. Conclusion: ESBL-producing isolates could be reported as susceptible to a cephalosporin with revised breakpoints although clinical use is uncertain. A higher proportion of isolates would be reported as nonsusceptible to cephalosporins or carbapenems with lowered breakpoints and thus increasing use of broadspectrum antimicrobial agents should be monitored.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.