Abstract
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Impact; asteroid surfaces; SSDEM; SPH.</p> <p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Impacts can modify the physical state of a substantial fraction of a target body. Studying the hypervelocity impact process and outcome is crucial in the interpretation of the history of a planetary body (Jutzi et al., 2015) and the design of asteroid deflection strategies based on the kinetic impactor technique (Raducan et al., 2019). Images returned by space missions show that small asteroids have complex surface morphologies with heterogeneous distributions of fine regolith and large boulders (e.g., Watanabe et al., 2019). To properly decipher the crater imprints on asteroid surfaces, we carried out numerical investigations to understand the effect of surface material properties (i.e., friction, cohesion) and the presence of large boulders on cratering processes.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> We used a hybrid SPH-SSDEM framework to model the high-speed impact cratering (Zhang et al., 2021). The Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) is used to simulate the initial shock propagation and fragmentation stage (Jutzi & Michel, 2015). The outcome is then transferred into a Soft-Sphere Discrete Element Method (SSDEM) code (Zhang et al., 2018), which solves the ejecta evolution and crater growth in the later stages. This modeling framework is capable of simulating impacts from the beginning to the later stages when all ejecta are settled down, allowing capturing the final morphology of the resulting crater.</p> <p>To make comparisons with the first impact experiment performed on an asteroid by the Hayabusa2 Small Carry-on Impactor (SCI; Arakawa et al., 2020), we conducted SCI-like cratering tests using the same impact condition (except using an impact angle of 0º) and Ryugu’s gravity field. The target is modeled as a 15-meter-radius granular bed held by a hemispherical ball. The particle-ball contact parameters are the same as those used for particle-particle contacts.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> As the SCI cratering analyses show consistencies with a very low-strength scaling law (Arakawa et al., 2020), we considered modeling the surface properties with three types of low cohesion (i.e., 0 Pa, 0.01 Pa, and 0.1 Pa) and four types of low to moderate friction angles (20°, 25°, 30°, and 33°). The results show that, in a monotonic manner, the diameter and depth of the resulting crater and rim decrease with a larger friction or cohesion (Fig. 1). Compared with the crater morphology of the SCI impact (i.e., crater diameter 14.5 ± 0.8 m and depth ~2.3 m, rim diameter 17.6 ± 0.7 m and depth 0.4 m), the case with <em>C</em> = 0.1 Pa and
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.