Abstract

Introduction Monolithic zirconia is able to achieve certain aesthetic, but its durability in resisting fracture has been questioned, as fractures often originate from margins of restoration. This study determined fracture resistance of highly translucent monolithic zirconia crowns with different margin designs in terms of marginal thickness and collar height. Materials and Methods Zirconia blanks (Ceramill® Zolid HT+) were selected for the fabrication of zirconia crowns according to different designs, including varying margin thicknesses (light chamfer, CL; heavy chamfer, CH) and collar heights (no collar, NC; low collar, LC; high collar, HC), which resulted in CLNC, CLLC, CLHC, CHNC, CHLC, and CHHC groups (15 crowns each). The crowns were seated on a metal die and loaded vertically through round end punch (θ = 10 mm), contacting with inclined planes of cusp in a testing machine with crosshead speed of 0.2 mm/min until fracture. Videos with a rate of 50 frames/second were used to record fracture. Fracture load (N) and durable period (s) were compared for significant differences using ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05). Results The mean ± sd of fracture load (N) and durable time (s) were 3211 ± 778 and 212 ± 47 for CLNC; 3041 ± 1370 and 188 ± 53 for CLLC; 2913 ± 828 and 192 ± 27 for CLHC; 4226 ± 905 and 245 ± 35 for CHNC; 4486 ± 807 and 228 ± 29 for CHLC; and 4376 ± 1043 and 227 ± 37 for CHHC. This indicated that marginal thickness had a significant influence on load-bearing capacity and durable time (p < 0.05). No significant impact of collar height was shown, either on load-bearing capacity or durable time (p > 0.05). No interaction between two factors was presented (p > 0.05). Conclusions Heavy chamfer margin provided stronger zirconia crown than light chamfer, but both were capable of withstanding fracture load higher than maximum masticatory force. Neither presence nor absence of collar indicated any impact on strength. Fabrication of zirconia crowns with either heavy or light chamfer margin and either presence or absence of collar, with the consideration of emergence profile, should be considered.

Highlights

  • Monolithic zirconia is able to achieve certain aesthetic, but its durability in resisting fracture has been questioned, as fractures often originate from margins of restoration. is study determined fracture resistance of highly translucent monolithic zirconia crowns with different margin designs in terms of marginal thickness and collar height

  • Zirconium dioxide has been introduced for use in restorative dentistry as a zirconia-based ceramic veneering prosthesis. e zirconia frameworks were predominantly fabricated in the form of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) [1, 2]

  • Erefore, the objective of this experimental study was to compare the fracture load and durable time of fracture for monolithic zirconia crowns with different geometric designs of margins upon compressive loading. e null hypothesis was that different marginal designs of high-translucency monolithic zirconia (HTMZ) restorations had no significant effect on fracture load or durable time for fracture strength

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All ceramic restorations have been widely used for fixed partial dentures because of their biocompatibility and aesthetics outcomes. Some investigations into the fracture resistance of all ceramic restorations were carried out by applying an occlusal load, either longitudinally or obliquely, on anatomical crowns until fracture, indicating that the fracture was possibly influenced by the design of the margin in the restoration [22,23,24]. The effects of marginal design and restoration configuration on fracture characteristics, are still certainly unclear in terms of optimal strength in a high-translucency monolithic zirconia (HTMZ) restoration. Erefore, the objective of this experimental study was to compare the fracture load and durable time of fracture for monolithic zirconia crowns with different geometric designs of margins upon compressive loading. Erefore, the objective of this experimental study was to compare the fracture load and durable time of fracture for monolithic zirconia crowns with different geometric designs of margins upon compressive loading. e null hypothesis was that different marginal designs of HTMZ restorations had no significant effect on fracture load or durable time for fracture strength

Materials and Methods
Design NC LC HC
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call