Abstract

BackgroundThe mechanisms of clinical pain relief associated with spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are poorly understood. Our objective was to determine whether lumbar high-velocity low-amplitude SMT altered pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinprick sensitivity (PPS) locally and remotely, how long any change lasted (up to 30 min), and whether changes related to the side of SMT.MethodsThirty-four asymptomatic participants (mean age 22.6 years ±4.0) received a right- or left-sided lumbar SMT. PPT and PPS were measured bilaterally at the calf, lumbar spine, scapula, and forehead before and immediately, 10, 20, and 30 min after intervention. Data were collected between October 2014 and June 2015.ResultsBilateral calf and lumbar spine PPT increased significantly after 10 – 20 min and was maintained at 30 min (7.2–11.8 % increase). PPS decreased significantly in all locations at various times (9.8 – 22.5 % decrease). At the calf and lumbar spine, PPT increased slightly more ipsilateral to the SMT than contralateral.ConclusionsLumbar SMT reduced deep pressure sensitivity locally and in the lower limbs for at least 30 min, whereas sensitivity to pinprick was reduced systemically. These findings suggest that SMT specifically inhibits deep pressure sensitivity distally. These findings are novel compared to other lumbar SMT studies, and may reflect a local spinal or complex supraspinal analgesic mechanism.Trial registrationRegistered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000682640).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12998-016-0128-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The mechanisms of clinical pain relief associated with spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are poorly understood

  • Pressure pain threshold Significant effects over time were observed for calf (p = .03, ƞP2 = .09) and lumbar spine pressure pain threshold (PPT) (p = .003, ƞP2 = .15) with weak effect sizes

  • There was no effect over time for PPT at the scapula (p = .71, ƞP2 = .01) or forehead (p = .67, ƞP2 = .01)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The mechanisms of clinical pain relief associated with spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are poorly understood. Evidence is mixed but some studies suggest that SMT may be effective in managing non-specific spinal pain and some types of headache [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a widely used form of experimental pain, which represents the amount of mechanical pressure required to elicit a nociceptive response at the testing site. It is thought deep Aδ and C sensory fibres are activated at the PPT [10,11,12]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call