Abstract

BackgroundAlthough low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with gastric cancer, it's difficult for surgeons to choose appropriate time to start anti-coagulation because of the risk of surgical field bleeding after radical gastrectomy. We compared the risk of VTE and bleeding between patients receiving LMWH within and beyond 48 ​h after surgery. MethodsThe medical records of consecutive cases receiving radical gastrectomy from November 1st, 2017 to October 31st, 2018 in Zhongshan Hospital Gastric Cancer Center were carefully reviewed. Patients receiving LMWH within and beyond 48 ​h after surgery were regarded as Early Group (EG) and Delayed Group (DG), respectively. Incidence of VTE and bleeding complications were compared and risk factors of bleeding were evaluated. ResultsSix hundred and sixty-five cases were enrolled, including 465 in EG and 200 in DG. No significant differences of clinicopathological or operative features were observed except for fewer combined resection (DG: 5.0%, EG: 1.9%, P ​= ​0.030) and shorter surgery duration (DG: 194min, EG: 168min, P ​< ​0.001). No patients suffered from deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in our study. However, postoperative bleeding rate was higher in EG (DG: 1.5%, EG: 7.5%, P ​= ​0.002). Multivariate analysis suggested that EG was the independent risk factor of bleeding (OR: 3.744, 1.13–12.36, P ​= ​0.030). ConclusionUse of LMWH 48 ​h after radical gastrectomy maybe a good choice for clinical surgeons to reduce postoperative bleeding rate without increasing VTE risk in gastric cancer patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call