Abstract
Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are intended to protect the primary structure of buildings by absorbing most earthquake input energy through the plastic deformation of the steel cores. The ultra-low-cycle fatigue performance of BRBs is crucial for their seismic performance as energy dissipators. Despite the plenty of research on the ultra-low-cycle fatigue behavior of steel members, it remains susceptible if arbitrary loading paths have a major effect on the ultra-low-cycle fatigue life or cumulative plastic deformation (CPD) capacity of BRBs. This paper introduces an experimental campaign of nine supposedly identical BRB specimens subjected to three different loading protocols of similar average strain amplitudes. For each loading protocol, the test was repeated for three times to account for possible uncertainty. The results show that the effect of loading protocol is trivial given the similar average strain amplitudes throughout the loading. The Miner's assumption that the loading sequence has no effect on the fatigue life of BRBs is supported by the test results, however, the proper choice of the Coffin-Masson model's parameters is crucial. The skeleton ratio, which is derived from decomposing the hysteresis curve into a skeleton part and a Bauschinger part and has been used to account for the loading path effects, is shown to be insensitive to varied loading protocols by the test results.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
