Abstract

Achievement emotions constitute one important variable among the many variables of students’ learning. The aim of this research was to analyze the differential effect of university students’ levels of self-regulation (1 = low, 2 = medium and 3 = high), and of their level of perceived stress in three academic situations (1 = class, 2 = study time and 3 = testing), on the type of achievement emotionality they experience (positive and negative emotions). The following hypotheses were established: (1) a higher level of student self-regulation would be accompanied by higher levels of positive emotionality and lower levels of negative emotionality and (2) a higher level of situational stress would predispose higher levels of negative emotionality and lower levels of positive emotionality. A total of 520 university students completed three self-reports with validated inventories. Descriptive, correlational, and structural prediction analyses (SEM) were performed, as well as 3 × 3 ANOVAs, under an ex post facto design by selection. The results showed overall fulfillment of the hypotheses, except for a few specific emotions. Implications for prevention and psychoeducational guidance in the sphere of university education are discussed.

Highlights

  • University, or higher education, seeks to offer adequate scientific and vocational preparation.This objective, has been expanded to include elements of emotional well-being

  • A significant bivariate association appeared between SR and positive emotions (r = 0.431; p < 0.001)

  • In the case of situational stress, it was significantly associated with positive emotions (r = −0.119; p < 0.001) and with negative emotions (r = 0.290; p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

University, or higher education, seeks to offer adequate scientific and vocational preparation. This objective, has been expanded to include elements of emotional well-being. Assessment of university quality incorporates satisfaction with the university experience, and how it provides for psychological well-being [1,2]. To better understand this reality, recent research has taken a shift towards analyzing and understanding individual differences, in interaction with different academic situations. The present research study, is situated at the molar level of psychoeducational analysis [4]. This means that the research problem centers on the person × context level of analysis, in a

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call