Effect of legal protection and management of protected areas at preventing land development: a Spanish case study

David Rodríguez-Rodríguez,Javier Martínez-Vega

doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1369-8

Abstract

Protected areas are entrusted long-term biodiversity conservation, but measures of their effectiveness are limited, methodologically diverse and, sometimes, of improvable accuracy. Using a semi-experimental BACI research design, this study assesses the environmental effectiveness of two highly related multiple-use protected area (PA) categories of European relevance at preventing land development: Sites of Community Importance (SCIs) and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs). The non-overlapping SCI and SAC polygon networks of a northern Spanish region (Navarra) were used as the best possible case studies in the country because their main difference is implementation of active management (in the case of SACs). One kilometre outer buffer areas were created to serve as controls for each of the two PA networks. Three spatial-statistical models that progessively consider exclusion areas according to additional land protection legislation and biophysical covariates were tested to maximise their accurateness. Percentual increases of land development were compared for each of the four groups: SCIs, SCI-Buffers, SACs and SAC-Buffers, using Corine Land Cover (CLC) data from 2006 and 2012. Results show that SACs have been fully effective at preventing land development in the Navarra region whereas some exceptional development occurred in SCIs, even though their biophysical characteristics made them less prone to development than their buffer areas. Additional legislation seems to slightly add to protection inside PAs and provides clear protection to surrounding buffer areas. Residential uses were minor among the new artificial uses around Navarra’s PAs.

Highlights

Land development resulting from urban, industrial and infrastructural expansion is a phenomenon of global concern due to Editor: Peter Verburg Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.D
Other land use-land cover (LULC) changes, such as cropland expansion, may have important effects on biodiversity (Davis et al 2014; Martinuzzi et al 2015), it is assumed that those changes can be reversed much more sometimes through natural succession, than changes from natural or semi-natural LULCs to artificial LULCs (McKinney 2002)
In model 1, Site of Community Importance (SCI) and SCI-buffers, on the one hand, and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and SACs buffers on the other were very similar in all covariates except in ‘degree of initial treeless cover’ (Appendix 3)

Summary

Introduction

LULC changes from natural or semi-natural LULCs to artificial ones can be considered largely permanent and irreversible (Jiménez et al 2005). We focused on these LULC changes as the primary metric of PA effectiveness (Nagendra 2008) for having the greatest direct, negative and permanent impact on biodiversity conservation (McKinney 2002). Other LULC changes, such as cropland expansion, may have important effects on biodiversity (Davis et al 2014; Martinuzzi et al 2015), it is assumed that those changes can be reversed much more sometimes through natural succession, than changes from natural or semi-natural LULCs to artificial LULCs (McKinney 2002)

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion