Abstract

As AM lattices become more popular in medical devices, it is important to consider how lattice design parameters affect the mechanical integrity and performance of a device. This research investigated the effect of lattice orientation on the compressive mechanical response of five common lattice geometries: Hexagonal Honeycomb (Hex), Diamond, Voronoi Tessellation Method (VTM), sheet-based Gyroid, and Face-Centered-Cubic (FCC). Samples were tested at two relative densities and eight orientations, printed in Nylon 12 (PA2200) on an EOS P396. The mechanical response was compared to simulated finite element analysis (FEA) response for Hex and FCC lattices. Hex lattices displayed significant orientation dependance. Diamond lattices demonstrated some orientation dependance when at a lower relative density. Gyroid, FCC, and VTM all displayed minimal orientation dependance. Increasing lattice relative density appeared to reduce anisotropy among tested orientations of all lattice geometries except Hex. FEA simulations were able to produce a trend response that matched the mechanical response trends based on the investigated orientations. These results support the need for multi axial lattice mechanical test considerations. It also bolsters the need for lattice FEA models to have a sufficient comparator when identifying “worst-case” lattice test scenarios.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.