Abstract
Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative musculoskeletal condition that imposes a major healthcare burden due to considerable pain, disability and loss of quality of life especially among the older adults. Most knee OA researchers have focused on tertiary management strategies i.e pain relief with effective drug therapies (Non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs, chondroitin supplements etc). However, long-term use of NSAIDS have significant side effects and are expensive. With the exception of knee joint arthroplasty, typically reserved for end-stage disease, there is no definitive cure for osteoarthritis. Accordingly, there is an urgent need for conservative treatment modalities, that not only alleviate painful symptoms of OA, but also reduce the progression of the degenerative pathology over time. Patients with knee OA usually show major involvement in only one compartment; medial tibiofemoral compartment being more common than the lateral compartment. The lateral wedge shoe insole is an orthotic device, which is hypothesized to reduce the moment arm of the ground reaction force vector relative to the knee joint center during walking. They are an inexpensive and feasible treatment modality, that has shown to reduce medial knee load. Materials and Methods: 80 patients with bilateral medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee were included in the present study. They were randomly divided into two groups ; Group A (n = 40) included patients who were given lateral wedged insole shoes and Group B (n = 40) included those who were given normal flat soled shoes. All patients who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. The present study was carried between January 2020 to January 2021 in Krishna Institute Of Medical Sciences, “Deemed to be University” Karad. Severity of pain using WOMAC score, FTA using plain knee radiograph in AP view and frequency of intake of NSAIDS were calculated at the start of study, thereafter at each follow up every 2 months up to 12 months. Results: At the initial 2nd month follow up group A patients showed significant reduction in severity pain scale (66.74+/-19.44) as compared to group B (72.78+/-17.04), but neither of group A or group B showed any significant change in remaining variable characters (p>0.005). At the end of 12 months follow up assessment, Group A patients showed a marked reduction in severity of pain (average 46.8+/-16.24) as compared to Group B (mean 59.26+/-18.74). Patients in Group A showed significant decrease in the frequency of intake of NSAIDS for pain relief as compared to patients in Group B (p
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.