Abstract

Many studies have been conducted on the effect of item order in self-report questionnaires on mean scores. This research aims to study the effect of item order on measurement invariance in addition to mean scores. To this end, two groups randomly obtained from the same sample were presented a fixed order form in which all items belonging to the same dimension were adjacent to each other, and a random order form in which the items were randomly sequenced respectively. The results obtained revealed a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the two forms. In the next stage of the study, the fit indices obtained from the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) applied to the two separate forms and the modification indices (MI) suggested by the software were compared. Both forms returned high modification suggestions for adjacent items or items presented near each other. Additionally, it was found that high χ2 reductions suggested by the MIs in one form resulted in low χ2 reductions in the other. Lastly, multiple group CFA (mg-CFA) was conducted to determine whether or not measurement invariance was achieved through different item order presentations of the scale. The findings indicate that measurement invariance could not be achieved even at the first stage of analysis. It may specifically be stated that presenting respondents items under the same dimension together ensures empirical findings congruent with theoretical structure.

Highlights

  • Data sources have constantly developed and diversified in social sciences, and self-reporting questionnaires are still widely used

  • One such instance is item order effect, in which respondents’ response behaviors change due to items comprising a scale being presented in different orders

  • Two groups were established randomly from a sample, and the fixed order form was presented to the control group, while the random order form was presented to the treatment group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data sources have constantly developed and diversified in social sciences, and self-reporting questionnaires are still widely used. Studies on self-report questionnaires regarding issues caused by responders such as social-desirability (Phillips and Clancy, 1972; Nederhof, 1985; Peltier and Walsh, 1990; King and Bruner, 2000; Larson, 2019), inconsistent or careless responding (Huang et al, 2012; Meade and Craig, 2012; Akbulut, 2015), satisficing (Krosnick et al, 1996; Zhang and Conrad, 2013; Hamby and Taylor, 2016) and their influence on response behavior and scale validity have been widely studied In addition to these factors, influence stemming from the measurement tool that may affect response behavior may be significant. It may be stated that this matter is largely ignored in the field (Schwarz, 1999)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call