Abstract
Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior of an Al–Cu–Mg–Si forging alloy was investigated at room temperature. Isothermal aging (T6) and non-isothermal aging (NIA) treatments were applied to produce different microstructures. Under the same strain amplitude, the LCF life of NIA specimen exceeded that of T6 specimen. Besides, NIA specimens exhibited cyclic stability behavior in contrast to cyclic hardening behavior of T6 specimens. The different LCF behaviors could be rationalized by different deformation mechanisms under cyclic straining. T6 specimens with non-shearable θ′-phases underwent Orowan bypassing mechanism leading to the cyclic hardening behavior. While NIA specimens with shearable and non-shearable θ′-phases suffered from both particle shearing and Orowan bypassing mechanisms resulting in the cyclic stability behavior. Non-shearable θ′-phases bypassed by dislocations introduced more stress concentration, while shearable θ′-phases cut through by dislocations caused less stress concentration. Therefore, fatigue life of NIA specimen is longer than that of T6 specimen.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
