Abstract

BackgroundIsocenter deviation, often induced by small displacements of both the device and the patient, is a common error seen in radiotherapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of isocenter deviation on the results of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan and dosimetric verification gamma passing rate in the treatment of cervical cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of 15 patients with cervical cancer who were treated with VMAT were retrospectively collected and analyzed. In this study, the isocenter site modification method was adopted. The VMAT plan with isocenter deviation adjustment was set as the experimental group, while the original plan was set as the control group. The impact of isocenter deviation on the results of the VMAT plan and dosimetric verification gamma passing rate was analyzed. Applying gamma analysis with different test criterions, the impact of isocenter deviation on the gamma passing rates was evaluated, and the sensitivity of different test criterions in identifying isocenter deviation was also analyzed.ResultsThere was a significant difference in the average dose in the target area between experimental group and control group (P<0.05). In organs at risk (OAR) terms, isocenter deviations also caused significant differences in dose parameters between the two groups. Except that there was no significant difference in the rectal V40 between two groups when the isocenter deviation was greater than 3 mm in the y axis direction. With the increase in the isocenter deviation, there was a trend towards decreased gamma passing rates with different analysis criterions in the experimental group. The 2 mm/2% standard had the highest sensitivity for identifying isocenter deviation.ConclusionsIsocenter deviation has significant effects on the results of the volume rotation intensity modulation plan and dosimetric verification gamma passing rates in the treatment of cervical cancer. When the isocenter deviation was less than 3 mm, a higher gamma passing rate (>90%) could also be obtained under the condition of the 3 mm/3% test criterions. It is recommended that the 2 mm/2% test standard should be utilized in clinical practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.