Abstract

For use as a naturalness criterion for duration rules in speech synthesis, human acceptability of change in segment duration is investigated with regard to the temporal position within a phrase. Three perceptual experiments are carried out to introduce variations in the attribute and context of a phrase in sentence speech: (1) the length of a phrase and the type of a phrase accent (2 lengths × 3 types), (2) variation in carrier sentence (3 carriers + 1 without carrier), and (3) the position of a phrase in a breath group (two positions). In total, 22 listeners evaluate the acceptability of resynthesized speech stimuli in which one of the vowel segments was either lengthened or shortened by up to 50 ms. Overall results show that a duration change in the phrase-initial segment is generally the least acceptable and that in the phrase-final segment the most acceptable, with that in a phrase at intermediate positions in between. This position-dependent tendency is observed regardless of the variations in phrase length, accent type, carrier sentence, presence of carrier sentence, and position in a breath group. These results suggest that the error criteria of duration modeling should be reconsidered by taking into account such perceptual characteristics in order to improve temporal naturalness in synthesized speech.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.