Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of seven-week inter-repetition rest vs. traditional resistance training on upper body maximum strength, the rate of force development and triceps brachii muscle architecture. Sixteen male participants were equally assigned into the inter-repetition rest and the traditional group. In both groups, training included the bench press exercise performed with 4 sets of 6 maximum repetitions, two training sessions per week. Twenty-second inter-repetition rest was employed for the inter-repetition rest group only. Measurements before and after the training period included maximum strength in the bench press, the isometric upper body rate of force development and peak force and triceps brachii muscle architecture. Maximum strength increased significantly in both groups (inter-repetition rest group: 21.5 ± 5.7% vs. traditional group: 13.5 ± 7.2%, p < 0.05), however, the maximum strength percentage increase was greater in the inter-repetition rest group compared to the traditional group (p = 0.027). Upper body isometric peak force increased only after inter-repetition rest training (10.7 ± 10.3%, p = 0.009). The rate of force development remained unchanged for both groups (p > 0.05), although percentage changes in time frames of 0-80 and 0-100 milliseconds were greater for the inter-repetition rest group compared to the traditional training group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.044, respectively). Triceps brachii thickness increased similarly for both groups (p < 0.05). These results suggest that inter-repetition rest may induce greater increases in maximum strength and the rate of force development compared to traditional training during the initial weeks of resistance training.

Highlights

  • Resistance exercise is a proven training intervention to increase muscle strength and mass, with various combinations of the acute training variables resulting in significant strength improvements

  • 0.568, η2 = 0.024). 1-RM bench press strength increased significantly in both groups, but interrepetition training induced a significantly higher percentage increase compared to traditional training (IRRG: 21.5 ± 5.7% vs. traditional group (TRG): 13.5 ± 7.2%, p = 0.027, η2 = 0.294)

  • Independent t-test analysis between percentage changes in the rate of force development (RFD) revealed that inter-repetition training induced greater percentage increases during 0-80 ms and 0-100 ms compared to traditional training (RFD80ms: inter-repetition rest group (IRRG) = 11.1 ± 16.1% vs. TRG = -4.2 ± 6.6%, p = 0.026, η2 = 0.307, RFD100ms: IRRG = 11.5 ± 17.3% vs. TRG = -3.2 ± 7.2%, p = 0.044, η2 = 0.258)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Resistance exercise is a proven training intervention to increase muscle strength and mass, with various combinations of the acute training variables resulting in significant strength improvements. It has been proposed that the introduction of a few second rest (e.g. 15-45 s) between single repetitions or after clusters of 2-3 repetitions in a single set, may result in faster adenosine triphosphate (ATP) resynthesis and lower concentration of muscle lactate, which allows the use of higher training intensity/volume and greater longitudinal increases in muscle strength (Haff et al, 2008; Iglesias-Soler et al, 2012; Nickolson et al, 2016). This resistance training strategy allows for a higher total training intensity and volume compared to traditional resistance training which may result in greater increases in velocity and power production (Inglesias-Soler et al, 2014; Torrejón et al, 2019). Accepted for printing in the Journal of Human Kinetics vol 81/2022 in January 2022

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call