Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane

Abstract

PurposeTo further evaluate the necessity of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM). MethodWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from their inception up to August 24, 2021. Eligible meta-analyses comparing iERM removal with and without ILM peeling were included. AMSTAR and GRADE classification was used to assess the methodological quality of each study and the quality for each outcome, respectively. The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and recurrence. Results10 meta-analyses were included. 75.9% of studies revealed no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the groups, while only 10.3% showed better BCVA favorable to additional ILM peeling. 54.2% reported no significant difference in CMT between the groups, followed by 41.7% showing thicker CMT due to additional ILM peeling. Compared to iERM removal alone, additional ILM peeling provided a lower recurrence rate in 66.7% of studies. ConclusionILM peeling could significantly reduce recurrence rate, but not significantly improve the recovery of visual outcome or decrease the thickness of central macula.