Abstract
Reductions in prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) are likely to be achieved only through small increments, amplifying the importance of precision of measurement. This study compared two instruments for measuring birth weight to investigate the effect of instrument precision on estimates of LBW prevalence. Analysis was based on 497 infants born to mothers enrolled in an ongoing community-based trial of the effect of umbilical cord and skin antisepsis on neonatal mortality in Nepal. For each child, two birth weight measurements were recorded within 72 hours after delivery using weighing scales of differing precisions (100 vs 2 g). While continuous measures between the two instruments were similar, the prevalence of LBW among lower precision measurements (30%) was 11.3% lower than for higher precision measurements (34%). The difference in precision between the instruments accounted for 96% of the difference in LBW prevalence estimates. Differences in estimated LBW rates may be entirely due to differences in instrument precision. Conclusions concerning programmatic or research intervention impact, or comparisons of rates across populations should consider the effect of instrument precision on estimates of LBW.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
