Abstract

Recent literature documented significant dependency between individual’s lifetime earnings and life expectancy. In light of this phenomenon, we examine the effect of using salary-fitted mortality tables on optimized withdrawal strategies. We find that while earnings rank meaningfully affects expected retirement length, the impact of modeling salary-fitted mortality is more nuanced and depends on investor’s risk aversion parameter. For a risk-averse investor, a 10% income-related difference in expected retirement length does not necessitate a sizable adjustment of an optimized withdrawal strategy: the unconditional mortality assumption causes annual withdrawals misallocation of only about 1-3% of pre-retirement consumption. In contrast, a risk-neutral investor is willing to adjust her optimal withdrawal strategy roughly in proportion to the change in expected retirement length and can experience a substantially larger withdrawals misallocation. Given this difference in results, we stress the need for a comprehensive and cohesive framework when analyzing full implications of a retirement horizon assumption.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call