Effect of implant abutment connection designs, and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: In-vitro study

Abstract

AimsThe purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the screw loosening of two different forms of implant abutment connection designs, and two implant diameters by measuring removal torque value (RTV) before and after cyclic loading. Materials and methodsTwenty implant fixtures were divided equally into 2 groups (N=10): group I fixture with conical hybrid connection (CH), and group II fixture with internal hex connection (IH). Each group was divided equally into two subgroups according to implant diameters: subgroup A (3.3mm), and subgroup B (4.2mm). Each fixture was vertically placed in the center of an acrylic resin block. The samples were fixed to the jig, and an implant abutment connected it with a 20 Ncm tightening torque. The samples were subjected to eccentric cyclic loading (at a distance of 5mm) away from center of abutment at 100,000 cycles. A digital torque gauge was used to evaluate screw loosening by measuring RTVs in (Ncm) before and after cyclic loading. The removal torque loss ratio before and after cyclic loading and the removal torque loss ratio between before and after cyclic loading were calculated and analyzed using the SPSS statistical analysis. ResultsFor GI the initial removal torque loss ratio measurement was (14.45±3.18) and decreased significantly after loading, it was (11.47±3.64). For GII the initial removal torque loss ratio measurement was (20.47±4.99) and increased significantly after loading, being (35.35±4.26). There is no significant effect upon screw loosening for two implant diameters. ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, the results suggested that conical hybrid connections showed a better screw stability than an internal hex connection. Therefore, the use of conical implants can be promoted as they have better screw stability compared to other systems.