Abstract
Accurate measurement of muscle protein turnover is critical for understanding the physiological processes underlying muscle atrophy and hypertrophy. Several mathematical approaches, used in conjunction with a tracer amino acid infusion, have been described to derive protein synthesis and breakdown rates from a two-pool (artery-vein) model. Despite apparently common underlying principles, these approaches differ significantly (some seem to not take into account arterio-venous shunting of amino acids, which comprises ∼80-90% of amino acids appearing in the vein) and most do not specify how tracer enrichment (i.e. mole percent excess (MPE) or tracer-to-tracee ratio (TTR)) and amino acid concentration (i.e. unlabelled only or total labelled plus unlabelled) should be expressed, which could have a significant impact on the outcome when using stable isotope labelled tracers. We developed equations that avoid these uncertainties and used them to calculate leg phenylalanine (Phe) kinetics in subjects who received a [(2) H5 ]Phe tracer infusion during postabsorptive conditions and during a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp with concomitant protein ingestion. These results were compared with those obtained by analysing the same data with previously reported equations. Only some of them computed the results correctly when used with MPE as the enrichment measure and total (tracer+tracee) Phe concentrations; errors up to several-fold in magnitude were noted when the same approaches were used in conjunction with TTR and/or unlabelled concentration only, or when using the other approaches (irrespective of how concentration and enrichment are expressed). Our newly developed equations should facilitate accurate calculation of protein synthesis and breakdown rates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have