Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to examine the effect of four commercial hydrogen-peroxide-based home bleaching agents on enamel microhardness. Fifteen human molars conserved in water for no more than 3 months were sectioned mesio-distally. The buccal and lingual surfaces were included in self curing acrylic resin, and the 30 specimens were ground until 600 grid (n=6). At baseline, 6 indentations (Vickers) were made on each of the 6 surfaces of each group, under load of 100g for 30s. Bleaching procedure was performed for 2 weeks with: 4.5% hydrogen-peroxide (Perfecta, Premier), 5.5% hydrogen-peroxide (DayWhite, Discus Dental), 7.5% hydrogenperoxide (DayWhite, Discus Dental), a polyethylene-strip whitening system containing 5.3% hydrogen-peroxide (Whitestrips, Procter&Gamble) and 10% carbamide peroxide (Opalescence, Ultradent) was used as control. After bleaching time, the specimens were rinsed and maintained in fresh artificial saliva, changed daily. A t-test compared each bleaching agent before and after treatment. The results showed that none of the five commercial home bleaching agents reduced the enamel microhardness. I t was concluded that all the five commercial home bleaching agents evaluated in our study showed no adverse effects on enamel microhardness.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call