Abstract

Hydrogel drug delivery systems (DDSs) for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) have garnered attention. However, there is a lack of meta-analysis summarizing their effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of pre-clinical evidence comparing hydrogel DDSs with free drug administration. Subgroup analyses were performed based on hydrogel materials (polysaccharide versus non-polysaccharide) and administration routes of the hydrogel DDSs (rectal versus oral). The outcome indicators included colon length, histological scores, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), zonula occludens protein 1(ZO-1), and area under the curve (AUC). The results confirmed the therapeutic enhancement of the hydrogel DDSs for UC compared with the free drug group. Notably, no significant differences were found between polysaccharide and non-polysaccharide materials, however, oral administration was found superior regarding TNF-α and AUC. In conclusion, oral hydrogel DDSs can serve as potential excellent dosage forms in oral colon −targeting DDSs, and in the design of colon hydrogel delivery systems, polysaccharides do not show advantages compared with other materials.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call