Abstract

Intergroup encounters are common in nonhuman primates and can vary from affiliative to aggressive. We extracted data from the literature to test five different hypotheses: 1) where there are group size differences between opposing groups, whether the larger group is more likely to win an intergroup encounter than the smaller group; 2) whether the likelihood of a group engaging in aggressive intergroup encounters increases with group size; and 3–5) whether dominant, older individuals, and/or males are more likely to participate aggressively in intergroup encounters than subordinate, younger individuals and/or females. Our data set comprised 52 studies on 31 primate species (3 lemur species, 5 New World monkeys, 19 Old World monkeys, and 4 apes). We found that the larger group is more likely to win an encounter against a smaller group than vice versa. We found no significant relationship between group size and propensity to be aggressive during intergroup encounters. We found weak/no support for the effect of age, dominance rank, and sex on the frequency of aggression displayed toward outgroup individuals during intergroup encounters. Species- and population-specific differences in inter- and intragroup competition and in the degree of the unequal distribution of resources across group members may explain why age, dominance rank, and sex are not strong predictors of aggression during intergroup encounters.

Highlights

  • Intergroup encounters are common in nonhuman primates and can vary from affiliative to aggressive

  • The number of aggressive intergroup encounters (IGEs) that a group engages in per day is positively related to group size, territoriality, and with home-range overlap (Willems and van Schaik 2015)

  • In our analyses we found support for the hypothesis that, for encounters in which there is numeric disparity between the two opposing groups, the larger group is more likely to win a IGE against a smaller group than vice versa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intergroup encounters are common in nonhuman primates and can vary from affiliative to aggressive. Dominant/adult individuals may gain greater fitness-related benefits than subordinate/younger animals by being aggressive toward outgroup individuals during IGEs, because they should have preferential access to the contested resources if their group wins an IGE (ArseneauRobar et al 2017; Cooper et al 2004; Lazaro-Perea 2001; Majolo et al 2005; Nunn and Deaner 2004; Willems et al 2015). Females avoid the risk of engaging in aggressive interactions with outgroup members by incentivizing their group males to participate in IGEs and by punishing males that do not take part (Arseneau-Robar et al 2016, 2017)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call