Effect of General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation/Local Anesthesia on the Outcome of Patients with Minor Stroke and Isolated M2 Occlusion Undergoing Immediate Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Matched Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThis study investigates the impact of general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation/local anesthesia (CS/LA) on the outcome of patients with minor stroke and isolated M2 occlusion undergoing immediate mechanical thrombectomy (iMT). MethodsThe databases of 16 comprehensive stroke centers were retrospectively screened for consecutive patients with isolated M2 occlusion and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≤ 5 who received iMT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to estimate the effect of GA versus CS/LA on clinical outcome and procedure-related adverse events. Primary outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-1. Secondary outcome measures were 90-day mRS score 0-2 and all-cause mortality, successful reperfusion, procedural-related symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH), intraprocedural dissections and new territory embolism. ResultsOf the 172 patients that were selected, 55 received GA and 117 CS/LA. After PSM, 47 pairs of patients were available for analysis. We found no significant differences in clinical outcome, rates of efficient reperfusion and procedural-related complications between patients receiving GA or LA/CS. (mRS 0-1: p=0.815; mRS 0-2: p=0.401; all-cause mortality: p=0.408; modified Treatment In Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3: p=0.374; sSAH: p=0.082; intraprocedural dissection: p=0.408; new territory embolism: p=0.462) ConclusionsIn patients with minor stroke and isolated M2 occlusion undergoing iMT, the type of anesthesia does not affect clinical outcome or the rate of procedural-related complications. Our results agree with recent data showing no benefit of one specific anesthesiologic procedure over the other and confirm their generalizability also to patients with minor baseline symptoms.