Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare four manufacturing processes of Co-Cr dental alloys: casting (CAST), computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milling (MILL), selective laser melting (SLM), and laser directed energy deposition (LDED). Comparison included microstructural, mechanical, and electrochemical analyses. Half of the samples obtained were heat treated to simulate the porcelain fused to metal (PFM) firing process, and the metal real state in an oral environment. Co-Cr dental alloys manufactured via casting, LDED, milling, and SLM techniques presented evident differences in their mechanical properties. However, their electrochemical performances were similar, with high resistance to corrosion in artificial saliva, in both aerated and deaerated media (corrosion rate under 4 microns per year). LDED and milling materials showed the highest modulus of toughness, and gave improved results in comparison with CAST and SLM techniques (p < 0.05). The LDED process could be implemented in the manufacturing of the restorative dental industry, with a high overall performance, competing directly with the best quality techniques, and reducing their disadvantages.

Highlights

  • Dental restorations have been widely employed throughout the last 100 years

  • SEM images obtained from the CAST, laser directed energy deposition (LDED), MILL, and selective laser melting (SLM) samples revealed different microstructures as well as their evolution through the porcelain fused to metal (PFM) firing simulation (Figure 2)

  • This study focused on the comparison of four different manufacturing techniques of PFM dental

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dental restorations have been widely employed throughout the last 100 years. The most employed materials were gold and its alloys [1]. The high value of this metal led to the use of other non-precious metallic alloys like Co-Cr or Ni-Cr. Ni-based ones are progressively disappearing due to their toxicity [2]. That is why Co-Cr alloys are nowadays the predominant preference in the dental restoration industry, thanks to their improved biocompatibility [3] and their better behavior against corrosion [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call