Abstract

Forward body biasing improves the low-frequency noise performance of p-channel metal-oxide semiconductor (PMOS) transistors by about 8 dB/V. Therefore, for analog design, forward body biasing may be preferred if noise is a concern. This is in agreement with the improvement of other MOSFET parameters such as the decrease of the threshold voltage (V/sub T/) or the increase of unity current-gain frequency (f/sub T/) on forward substrate- (or body)-source biasing (V/sub BS/). Also, forward V/sub BS/ is very attractive for low voltage supply (V/sub DD/<0.6 V) and low-power, low-noise circuits. A detailed analysis of the dependence of the noise level on VBS and on the gate-source (V/sub GS/) biasing showed that the dependence on V/sub BS/ seems to be smaller in weak inversion, and it increases in strong inversion. The dependence on V/sub GS/ has a turning point at V/sub GS//spl ap/0.8 V, independent of body bias, which it seems is due to the activation of oxide traps, as the noise waveform showed a random telegraph signal (RTS) component at V/sub GS/>0.8 V. Generally, it is confirmed that the spectral density S/sub I/ of the total low-frequency noise of the drain current I/sub D/ is proportional to the square of I/sub D/, i.e., S/sub I//spl prop/I/sub D//sup 2/, but it cannot be clearly ascribed to either number fluctuation or mobility fluctuation models. In addition, both models cannot accurately describe the dependence of the noise level on the body bias.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call