Effect of Formulation Parameters on Enalapril Maleate Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablet Using Quality by Design (QbD) Approach.

Abstract

The buccal route has great prospects and possible benefits for the administration of drugs systemically. The present study involves designing, developing and optimising the buccal tablet formulation of Enalapril Maleate (EM) by using the QbD approach. We prepared the EM buccal tablets using the dry granulation method. In the QTPP profile, the CQAs for EM buccal tablets are Mucoadhesive strength, swelling index and drug release (dependent variables); the CMAs identified for EM buccal tablets were Carbopol 934P, HPMC-K100M and chitosan (independent variables). Diluent quantity, blending time and compression force were selected as CPPs; the Box-Behnkentdesign was used to evaluate the relationship between the CMAs and CPPs. Based on the DoE, the composition of the optimised formulation of EM BT-18 consists of 20mg of EM, 15 mg of carbopol 934p, 17 mg of HPMC-K100M, 10mg of chitosan, 30 mg of PVP K-30, 1 mg of magnesium stearate, 16 mg of Mannitol, 1 mg of aspartame, and 50 mg of Ethyl cellulose. The optimised formulation of EM BT 18 was found to have a Mucoadhesive strength of 24.32±0.30g. The swelling index was 90.74±0.25% and drug release was sustained up to 10 hours 98.4±3.62% compared to the marketed product, whose release was up to 8 hours. We attempted to design a buccal tablet of Enalapril Maleate for sustained drug release in the treatment of hypertension. Patients who cannot take oral medication due to trauma or unconscious conditions could receive the formulation. Development of a newly P.ceutical product is very time-consuming, extremely costly and high-risk, with very little chance of a successful outcome. Hence, this study showed EM tablets are already available on the market but we have chosen a buccal drug delivery system using a novel approach using QbD tools to target the quality of the product accurately.