Abstract

4032–10 vol.% fly ash particle composite foams were processed using stirring technique, followed by direct foaming. Two types of fly ash particles were used; one was microballoons with two different average diameters of 80 and 140 μm. The other was solid precipitators with an average size of 20 μm. The structural analysis of the composite foams revealed that the pores were mostly closed-cell and irregular ellipses with nearly the same size in each foam sample. EDXA at fly ash–matrix interface showed excess Mg and O at the interface compared with that at the 4032 matrix alloy. The CTEs of the 4032 foam were higher than those of the composite foams. The compression tests indicated that the 4032 and composite foam stress–strain curves exhibited the behavior of typical plastic foam and the composite foam had higher yield, plateau and plastic stress in comparison to those of the 4032 foam. The composite foams showed a lower strain-hardening exponent when compared with the 4032 foam. As the result of higher strength of the composite foams, the increase in energy absorption of the composite foam sample with fly ash precipitators ranged over two times compared to that of 4032 foam.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.