Abstract

The Sogami−Ise (SI) interaction potential has a “long range attraction” tail that is not present in the DLVO potential. Overbeek suggested that an “error” was present in the SI theory and that the inclusion of the solvent contribution eliminated the source of this long range attraction. The model used by Overbeek assumed that the macroions, by virtue of being fixed in their equilibrium positions, did not contribute to the electrical free energy of the solution. It is shown herein that the “Overbeek correction” is not rigorously zero for arbitrary polyion concentrations, as it must be in order to eliminate the Gibbs minimum for actual experimental conditions. It is shown herein on the basis of standard statistical thermodynamics expressions that the presence of a minimum in the pairwise Gibbs electrical free energy occurs for all screened Coulombic expressions for the Helmholtz electrical free energy, and therefore the correction term of Overbeek is in error. It is concluded that the concepts of screened C...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.