Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of final irrigation protocols on microhardness reduction and erosion of root canal dentin. Sixty root canals from mandibular incisors were instrumented and randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) according to the irrigant used: QMiX, 17% EDTA, 10% citric acid (CA), 1% peracetic acid (PA), 2.5% NaOCl (solution control), and distilled water (negative control). The chelating solutions were used to irrigate the canal followed by 2.5% NaOCl as a final flush. After the irrigation protocols, all specimens were rinsed with 10 mL of distilled water to remove any residue of the chemical solutions. Before and after the final irrigation protocols, dentin microhardness was measured with a Knoop indenter. Three indentations were made at 100 µm and 500 µm from the root canal lumen. Afterwards, the specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopic analysis and the amount of dentin erosion was examined. Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze the results with a significance level set at 5%. At 100 µm, all protocols significantly reduced dentin microhardness (p < .05), while at 500 µm, this effect was detected only in the EDTA and QMiX groups (p < .05). CA was the irrigant that caused more extensive erosion in dentinal tubules, followed by PA and EDTA. QMiX opened dentinal tubules, but did not cause dentin erosion. Results suggest that QMiX and 17% EDTA reduced dentin microhardness at a greater depth. Additionally, QMiX did not cause dentin erosion.

Highlights

  • Root canal cleaning and disinfection are critical factors for a successful endodontic therapy

  • The smear layer is an amorphous film that is always formed by the action of endodontic instruments inside the root canal during chemomechanical preparation.[3,4]

  • There was no significant difference in microhardness reduction between 100 μm and 500 μm in each group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Root canal cleaning and disinfection are critical factors for a successful endodontic therapy. Chemical auxiliary agents are necessary in inaccessible areas of the root canal system[1] for periapical tissue repair.[2]. The smear layer is an amorphous film that is always formed by the action of endodontic instruments inside the root canal during chemomechanical preparation.[3,4] Since this residual layer can influence root canal filling quality, different techniques and solutions have been used and tested for its removal.[4,5] Chelating agents have been suggested for removal of the smear layer,[6,7] as well as for demineralization and softening of root dentin.[8] demineralization may have a negative influence on the chemical and structural composition of dentin.[8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call