Abstract
Soil fertilisation affects greenhouse gas emissions. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of different fertilisation strategies on N2O, CH4 emissions and on ecosystem respiration (CO2 emissions), during different periods of rice cultivation (rice crop, postharvest period, and seedling) under Mediterranean climate. Emissions were quantified weekly by the photoacoustic technique at two sites. At Site 1 (2011 and 2012), background treatments were 2 doses of chicken manure (CM): 90 and 170kgNH4+-Nha−1 (CM-90, CM-170), urea (U, 150kgNha−1) and no-N (control). Fifty kilogram N ha−1 ammonium sulphate (AS) were topdress applied to all of them. At Site 2 (2012), background treatments were 2 doses of pig slurry (PS): 91 and 152kgNH4+-Nha−1 (PS-91, PS-152) and ammonium sulphate (AS) at 120kgNH4+-Nha−1 and no-N (control). Sixty kilogram NH4+-Nha−1 as AS were topdress applied to AS and PS-91. During seedling, global warming potential (GWP) was ~3.5–17% of that of the whole rice crop for the CM treatments. The postharvest period was a net sink for CH4, and CO2 emissions only increased for the CM-170 treatment (up to 2MgCO2ha−1). The GWP of the entire rice crop reached 17Mg CO2-eqha−1 for U, and was 14 for CM-170, and 37 for CM-90. The application of PS at agronomic doses (~170kgNha−1) allowed high yields (~7.4Mgha−1), the control of GWP (~6.5MgCO2-eqha−1), and a 13% reduction in greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) to 0.89kgCO2-eqkg−1 when compared to AS (1.02kgCO2-eqkg−1).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.