Effect of femoral stem surface coating on clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: a patient-matched retrospective study.

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether changing the stem coating grants superior outcomes at a minimum follow-up of fiveyears. Retrospective review of a consecutive series of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) operatedby direct anterior approach between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2014. Two stems were compared, which were identical except for their surface coating; "the Original stem" was fully coated with hydroxyapatite (HA), while "the ProxCoat stem" was proximally coated with plasma-sprayed titanium and HA. Matching was performed. Clinical assessment included modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Oxford hip score (OHS), and forgotten joint score (FJS). Radiographic assessment evaluated alignment, subsidence, pedestal formation, heterotopic ossification, radiolucent lines ≥ 2mm, spot welds, cortical hypertrophy, and osteolysis. 232 hips received the Original stem and 167 the ProxCoat stem, from which respectively five hips (2.2%) and no hips (0%) underwent revision. Matching identified two groups of 91 patients, with comparable patient demographics. At > fiveyears follow-up, there were no differences in OHS (16 ± 6 vs 15 ± 5; p = 0.075) nor FJS (81 ± 26 vs 84 ± 22; p = 0.521), but there were differences in mHHS (89 ± 15 vs 92 ± 12; p = 0.042). There were no differences in alignment, subsidence, pedestal formation, heterotopic ossification, cortical hypertrophy, and osteolysis. There were differences in prevalence of proximal radiolucent lines (12% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and distal spot welds (24% vs 54%; p < 0.001). At a minimum follow-up of fiveyears, this study on matched patients undergoing primary THA found that ProxCoat stems results in significantly fewer radiolucent lines, more spot welds, and less revisions than Original stems, thus suggesting better bone ingrowth.