Effect of fatigue on muscle latency, muscle activation and perceived discomfort when exposed to whole-body vibration

Abstract

Whole-body vibration and muscle fatigue have both been shown to delay the trunk muscle reflex response and increase trunk muscle activation, leading to an increased risk of low back injuries. However, the effects of whole-body vibration on previously fatigued trunk muscles have never been tested, despite studies showing that prolonged exposure to whole-body vibration can lead to muscle fatigue. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of muscle fatigue on muscle latency, muscle activation and perceived discomfort when exposed to whole-body vibration. The results showed that a fatigued muscle state resulted in increased muscle latency, muscle activation and perceived discomfort, which all escalate the risk of low back injuries. Additionally, the ISO 2631-1 comfort ratings did not increase with fatigue, showing a disconnect between these comfort ratings and the perceived discomfort ratings in a fatigued muscle state. Practitioner summary: When exposed to whole-body vibration, fatigued back muscles result in delayed muscle contraction, higher overall muscle activation and increased perceived discomfort, all of which are known to increase low back injury risk. ISO 2631-1 comfort ratings are unable to increase with fatigue, showing a disconnect with perceived discomfort ratings. Abbreviations: EMG: electromyography; EO: external oblique; IO: internal oblique; LE: lumbar erector spinae; LEO: left externaloblique; LIO: left internal oblique; LLE: left lumbar erector spinae; LTE: left thoracic erector spinae; MVC: maximum voluntarycontraction; REO: right external oblique; RIO: right internal oblique; RLE: right lumbar erector spinae; RTE: right thoracicerector spinae; SEAT: Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility; TE: thoracic erector spinae; WBV: whole body vibration