Abstract

This in vitro study aimed to assess the effects of different pretreatments used to adapt glass-fiber posts cemented to root canals with different resin cements, regarding porosity percentage and bond strength. Twelve bovine incisor roots were prepared with Largo drills. After post space preparation, the specimens were randomized into two types of pretreatment groups (n = 3): water-wet bonding and ethanol-wet bonding. After the post were cemented, the roots were stored in 100% humidity at room temperature for 7 days. The samples were scanned by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Images were reconstructed by NRecon software, and CTAn software was used to analyze the porosity percentage (%) at the luting interface. Evaluation of the push-out bond strength was performed by serially cutting the roots, and submitting the slices to testing. Additionally, the resin cement post-gel shrinkage values (%) were measured using the strain-gauge method (n = 10). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test and Student's t test (a = 0.05). The roots prepared with ethanol-wet bonding using RelyX™ U200 had significantly lower porosity in the coronal and apical thirds (p < 0.05). The group prepared with ethanol-wet bonding using RelyX™ ARC presented better bond strength results in the coronal and apical thirds (p < 0.05). RelyX™ ARC (0.97%) produced a higher post-gel shrinkage value than RelyX™ U200 (0.77%). Canals pretreated with ethanol-wet bonding presented better outcomes in regard to porosity percentage and push-out bond strength.

Highlights

  • The rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth may be different from that of vital teeth, despite alteration of the coronal tooth structure

  • The root canals prepared with EBD presented the best

  • The null hypothesis was partially rejected because the pretreatment used in the fixation of fiber posts in the root canals influenced the total porosity and bond strength, and the resin cement type influenced the degree of post-gel shrinkage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth may be different from that of vital teeth, despite alteration of the coronal tooth structure. Teeth with fewer than two coronal walls usually require additional specialized retention.[1] Intraradicular posts are needed to provide retention if the remaining coronal tooth structure is not sufficient.[2] Glass-fiber posts have properties that are suitable for restoring endodontically treated teeth They have high flexural strength and an elasticity modulus (20 GPa) similar to that of dentin (18 GPa),[2] resulting in lower stress concentration at the root, and reducing the risk of root fractures.[1] these posts are susceptible to failure.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call