Abstract
The impact of wind turbine (WT) blade erosion is still a major issue today because of the associated high maintenance costs and the loss of power production. The erosion process is influenced by many physical phenomena that still need to be understood better. Especially WT manufactures and owners need to know the potential impact of different levels of blade erosion on annual energy production (AEP). The damage produced by erosion modifies the aerofoil shape and therefore its aerodynamic properties, resulting in an AEP drop. In this study, the effect of various morphologies of erosion on AEP was obtained. First, a 3D characterisation of eroded blades using a laser scanner was performed. The erosion damages were grouped into two typologies: Typology 1 covers pits and gouges, and Typology 2 covers extended loss of top coat. Based on this, 2D section geometries were defined to evaluate the effect of erosion on the aerofoil aerodynamic 2D properties, which was done using the CFD code WMB. The aerofoil used as a reference was DU96W180. It was determined that the erosion damage alters the aerodynamic behaviour of the aerofoil by reducing the Cl max and the slope of the Cl- α curve, which resulted in a drop of the aerodynamic efficiency from 40% to 72%. These detrimental effects increased depending on the damage location (i.e., pressure side and closeness to the leading edge), damage size and shape (i.e., sharp transitions from the eroded to non-eroded surfaces). To evaluate the erosion effect on the AEP, the NREL 5 MW WT was selected. All its components were kept except the last 30% outer section of the 61.5 m blade whose NACA64_A17 aerofoil was replaced by a DU96W180. The erosion damages were modelled by extending the 2D eroded geometry along this outer section. The AEP was calculated using BLADED 4.5. It was concluded that erosion resulted in a decrease of the AEP, which can be up to 1% and 6% for damages of Typology 1 and 2, respectively. This study will help to standardize and estimate the effect of the type of erosion on AEP losses for different shapes and erosion typologies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.