Effect of Electrolyte Composition on Performance and Stability of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Abstract

Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are necessary for our life to use as a mobile phone and so on. Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery is expected for next generation rechargeable battery owing to have high capacity (1,645 mAh/g) compared with conventional Li-ion batteries. Cycle performances are one of the index of battery. There is strongly related with a battery lifetime. The key issues of Li-S battery for cycle performances are the dissolution of sulfur species, the positive electrode active material, as Li2S x (lithium polysulfide). If we can suppress the dissolution of Li2S x , the battery life should be extended. Solvate ionic liquid (SIL) is mixture of 1:1 complex from low-molecular weight ether and Li salt, which have high thermal/electrochemical stabilities owing to strong interaction of between ether oxygen and Li cation. Also SIL electrolyte can suppress the dissolution of Li2S x . Recently, high Li salt concentration more than conventional SIL into electrolyte is important for high performance LIBs and Li-S batteries not only the high stability but also low Lewis basicity of electrolytes for low solubility of impurity with charge/discharge. Fig. 1 shows cycle performance of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 | [Li(G3) x ]TFSA | Li cell. Excess Li salts achieved high cycle performances and stable charge-discharge operations [1]. Fig. 2 shows Charge-discharge profiles with C/18(Li-S | [Li(G3)1]TFSA | Li cell). Over 1,000 mAh/g capacity at 1st charge-discharge, and 600 mAh/g capacity at 600 cycles were observed. We consider to importance for composition ratio glyme and LiTFSA for lithium-sulfur battery performance [2].However, quantitative analysis for dissolution of Li2S x into various SIL ([Li(G3) x ] [TFSA]) has not investigated. In this study, to clarify relationship between composition ratio and dissolution amount of Li2S x , saturated solubility of Li2S x was measured by electrochemical and UV-vis spectra. All experiments were examined in a glove box with Ar atmosphere. SILs, [Li(G3)1.25]TFSA, [Li(G3)1.11]TFSA, [Li(G3)]TFSA, [Li(G3)0.9]TFSA and [Li(G3)0.8]TFSA (composition ratio of glyme (G3,tryglyme) and LiTFSA is 10:8, 10:9, 10:10, 10:9 and 10:8), were prepared. Mixture of S8 and Li2S (S8:Li2S=7:8, we defined as Li2S8) were prepared. SILs of each concentration ratio prepared with Li2S8 was stirred to a saturated state with a hot stirrer at 50 ℃. It was oxidized to S8 by holding it at 3.0V for 12h using an electrolytic cell. The electrolytic and non-electrolytic SILs were each diluted 40 times (molar ratio) with HFE, and the absorbance was measured by UV-vis spectrometer. Lithium-sulfur batteries using electrolytes of each composition were prepared and charge and discharge cycle tests were carried out. Fig. 3 shows appearances of five LiTFSA concentration SILs with saturated Li2S8. This shows high concentration lithium salt electrolyte suppresses dissolution of Li2S x into each SILs. Fig. 4 shows UV-vis spectra of non- or electrolytic SILs. Color strength (dark to yellow) were decreased with Li salt concentration into SILs, and considered the solubility of Li2S x was controlled with the Li salt concentrations. We confirmed that improvement in cycle performances were observed in the lithium-sulfur batteries using various lithium salt concentration SILs. In the presentation, we will report to results of UV-vis spectra and correlation of between dissolution amount of Li2S x and battery performances.