Abstract

Environmental variations can influence the extent to which individuals interact with other individuals by changing the value of grouping. It is well known that many species can form and disband groups, often in response to the distribution and abundance of resources. While previous studies showed that resources influence the broad-scale structure of animal groups, knowledge gaps remain on whether they affect fine-scale patterns of association among individuals within groups. We quantify association patterns in African lions while simultaneously monitoring the abundance and distribution of prey. We test how social and ecological factors, including individual trait (age, sex, reproductive state) similarity and prey availability (prey abundance, dispersion, herd size and body size) affect within-pride social structure in African lions. We found that individual decisions about associates depended on resource availability with individuals associating equally across all members of the pride when prey herds were scarce, aggregated or large bodied, and associating more exclusively (in subgroups of preferred associates) when prey herds were abundant, dispersed or small bodied. Individuals within lion prides seemed to be buffering against changes in prey availability by modulating their strength and density of connections with conspecifics when prides split into subgroups. The strength and density of connections among individuals within subgroups was greater when prey herds were large and lower when prey herds were dispersed or are large bodied. Our findings suggest that individual lions are making social decisions at both the subgroup level and the pride level, with decisions representing putatively fitness-enhancing strategies. Individuals were typically shifting between having few strong connections and having many weaker connections depending on prevailing ecological conditions, with prey abundance, dispersion and body size having the greatest impact on decisions about splitting into subgroups. The maintenance of connections within prides and subgroups in the face of ecological change suggests that the fission-fusion nature of lion prides might be essential for the long-term maintenance of social connections even when short-term conditions do not allow them. More broadly, our study reveals how fission-fusion dynamics and ecological factors can simultaneously have an effect on animals across multiple levels of sociality.

Highlights

  • One important goal in animal ecology is to understand the relationship between environmental factors and animal population abundance, spatial distribution and social structure (Solomon, 1949)

  • Our study extends prior research on the role of ecological factors in determining broad population structure by demonstrating several ways in which measures of prey availability affect the finescale patterns of association among individuals

  • We demonstrate that these effects can take place at two scales: within prides and within subgroups

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

One important goal in animal ecology is to understand the relationship between environmental factors and animal population abundance, spatial distribution and social structure (Solomon, 1949). It allows us to understand complex social and ecological interactions in animal communities (Croft, James, & Krause, 2008; Farine & Whitehead, 2015) by providing metrics that quantify social structure at different levels of organisation, that is, within individuals, groups and populations. How do different aspects of food availability, such as the size and distribution of prey items, affect the finer-scale patterns of associations among individuals, in particular their decisions to form or disband subgroups?. The dynamics of resource availability; especially the abundance, type, and distribution of prey might influence finer scale lion social structure and this can have profound behavioural, ecological and evolutionary impacts (Foster et al, 2012; He et al, 2019). Individuals that had collar data with fixes covering the whole season were included in calculating seasonal home range to avoid underestimation of home-range size

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call