Abstract

Weak gravitational lensing is a powerful statistical tool for probing the growth of cosmic structure and measuring cosmological parameters. However, as shown by studies such as by Ménard et al., dust in the circumgalactic region of halos dims and reddens background sources. In a weak lensing analysis, this selects against sources behind overdense regions; since there is more structure in overdense regions, we will underestimate the amplitude of density perturbations σ 8 if we do not correct for the effects of circumgalactic dust. To model the dust distribution we employ the halo model. Assuming a fiducial dust mass profile based on measurements from Ménard et al., we compute the ratio Z of the systematic error to the statistical error for a survey similar to the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope reference survey (2000 deg2 area, single-filter effective source density 30 galaxies arcmin−2). For a wave band centered at 1580 nm (H band), we find that Z H = 0.37. For a similar survey with wave band centered at 620 nm (r band), we also computed Z r = 2.8. Within our fiducial dust model, since Z r > 1, the systematic effect of dust will be significant on weak lensing image surveys. We also computed the dust bias on the amplitude of the power spectrum, σ 8, and found it to be for each wave band Δσ 8/σ 8 = −3.1 × 10−4 (H band) or −2.2 × 10−3 (r band) if all other parameters are held fixed (the forecast Roman statistical-only error σ(σ 8)/σ 8 is 9 × 10−4).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call