Abstract

The introduction of new digital technologies represents an important advance to fabricate metal–ceramic restorations. However, few studies have evaluated the influence of these technologies on the fit of the restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different manufacturing techniques and pontic design on the vertical marginal fit of cobalt–-chromium (Co–Cr) posterior fixed partial dentures (FPDs) frameworks. Methods: Eighty stainless-steel dies were prepared to receive 3-unit FPDs frameworks with intermediate pontic (n = 40) and cantilever pontic (n = 40). Within each design, the specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10 each) depending on the manufacturing technique: casting (CM), direct metal laser sintering (LS), soft metal milling (SM), and hard metal milling (HM). The frameworks were luted, and the vertical marginal discrepancy was assessed. Data analysis was made using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Results: The vertical marginal discrepancy values of all FPDs were below 50 μm. The HM frameworks obtained the lowest misfit values in both designs. However, no differences were found among intermediate pontic groups or cantilevered groups. Likewise, when differences in a marginal discrepancy between both framework designs were analyzed, no differences were observed. Conclusions: The analyzed digital technologies demonstrated high precision of fit on Co–Cr frameworks and on both pontic designs.

Highlights

  • Metal–ceramic restorations are still the most widely used for fixed prosthodontics due to their reliability and good long-term prognosis, widely tested, which has led that they are considered to be the gold standard [1,2,3,4]

  • The overall mean and standard deviation marginal discrepancies values of intermediate and cantilever pontic frameworks are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively

  • When the cantilever frameworks were analyzed, the HMc group displayed the lowest marginal discrepancies (34.17 ± 15.85 μm), while the highest misfit values were observed in the SMc group (40.81 ± 5.55 μm)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metal–ceramic restorations are still the most widely used for fixed prosthodontics due to their reliability and good long-term prognosis, widely tested, which has led that they are considered to be the gold standard [1,2,3,4]. Soft metal milling is the most recent process within the subtractive method and consists of using metal blanks in a pre-sintered state. These blanks are milled and subsequently sintered in a special furnace until achieving the proper size (volumetric shrinkage of approximately 11%) [13]. This method has the advantages of shorter milling time, fewer machine tools wear (increasing its useful life), and less risk of material contamination due to dry milling [13]. The main drawbacks are that there may be differences in the final model production and limitations on materials so far [11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call