Abstract

In this study, the effects of tillage depth, forward speed and soil moisture content during the cultivator operation on the draft force, energy requirement, and soil disturbance were investigated using five types of cultivators. The experiments were performed in the factorial design based on the randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in loamy sand soil. Different soil moisture contents (factor A) from 5 to 16% for dry soils and 17 to 35% for wet soils, forward speed of tractor (factor B) at four levels of 1.16, 1.61, 1.97, and 3.82 km/hand working depth (factor C) at two levels of 10 and 20 cm were selected. The analysis of variance results showed that the main effects on the draft force, energy requirement, and soil disturbance were significant. With increasing the forward speed, working depth, and blade width, the draft force, energy requirement, and soil disturbance significantly increased. As the soil moisture content increased, the amount of draft force decreased. The average maximum draft force and energy requirement are related to the crescent cultivator and the lowest ones to the cultivator with a sweep blade. The maximum amounts of draft force and energy requirement at the speed of 3.82 km/h were 296.702 N and 0.03708 MJ in the dry conditions, respectively. The average maximum draft force and energy requirement are related to the crescent cultivator and the lowest ones to the cultivator with a sweep blade. The average maximum draft force and energy requirement in dry soil at 10–20 cm depth were 313.534 N and 0.039204 MJ, respectively, and the lowest values were 189 N and 0.019512 MJ in wet soil at the depth of 0–10 cm, respectively. The highest mean value of the area obtained from the profiles was 254.62 cm2 related to the dry conditions and forward speed of 3.82 km/h, and the lowest mean value of the area obtained in the wet conditions was 199.6 cm2 at the forward speed of 1.16 km/h. The highest average area obtained from the profiles was observed in the dry conditions for C4 as 434.813 cm2 and the lowest one was 57.94 cm2 in the wet conditions for the cultivator with a chisel blade and L-shaped shank. The highest average area created by cultivators at the 10–20 cm depth in the dry conditions was 332.875 cm2 and the lowest one at the 0–10 cm depth in the wet conditions was 123.55 cm2. The results of this study can help the designers and manufacturers of agricultural machinery to effectively design and manufacture the machinery with optimum draft and energy requirements.

Highlights

  • Pests and weeds are two critical barriers to the growth of crops, which considerably reduce the quantity, quality, and economic value of the crop [1,2]

  • The coefficient of variations of draft force and cultivator energy (CV) data is equal to 15.68%

  • -The parameters of forward speed, tillage depth, soil moisture content, and type of tool are the main factors affecting the draft force, energy requirement, soil disturbance, and area of the profiles created by the cultivators, where their main effects on the draft force of cultivators are significant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pests and weeds are two critical barriers to the growth of crops, which considerably reduce the quantity, quality, and economic value of the crop [1,2]. Cultivator application is one of the essential and cost-effective mechanical methods for the weed control to promote the plant growth through the weed eradication, soil preparation for rain storage, soil permeability modification, mixing of fertilizers and insecticides with soil, hilling, and increased activity of microorganisms [7,8]. Various research works have been conducted to explore the use of cultivators and effect of cultivator application on the crop yield. The research results show that the cultivator operation enhances the crop yield [9,10,11]. Afzalinia and Niromand-Jahromy [9] studied the performance of furrower, crescent, and rolling cultivators in the sugar beet fields to determine the number of operation times required during the growth period and the optimum cultivator. The working width of the machine varied from 30 to 60 cm [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call