Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate and compare the mechanism of swallowing with respect to the viscosity of ingested material between patients with and without dysphagia. DesignProspectively collected and retrospectively analyzed clinical study. SettingGeneral teaching hospital, rehabilitation unit. ParticipantsWe retrospectively reviewed the high-resolution manometry (HRM) results of 35 patients with dysphagia symptoms (N=35). Additionally, we included 18 patients without dysphagia. Based on videofluoroscopic swallowing study results, we classified the patients into 2 groups: one with aspiration and the other without aspiration. InterventionSwallowing of a 5-mL thin liquid and 5-mL honey-like liquid in all patients. Main Outcome MeasureHRM of various variables during the swallowing process. ResultsThere was no significant difference between the thin liquid and honey-like liquid with respect to parameters for HRM in the patients without dysphagia and in the nonaspiration and aspiration groups. However, in a comparison between thin liquid and honey-like liquid with respect to visuospatial and timing variables, the degree of differences in the maximal pressure of the velopharynx in the aspiration group was significantly larger than the patients without dysphagia and the nonaspiration group (P<.05). ConclusionsOur results indicate that there is a clear difference in the degree of adaptation to viscosity between the 3 groups—patients without dysphagia, patients with aspiration, and patients without aspiration. These differences may provide an explanation for the mechanism of swallowing, which may be useful for the treatment of dysphagia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.