Effect of Different Polymeric Matrices on Some Properties of Plastic Bonded Explosives

Abstract

AbstractMatrices based on polyisobutylene (PIB), polymethyl‐methacrylate (PA), Viton A 200, Dyneon FT 2481 (Fluorel), and polydimethyl‐siloxane binders were studied as desensitizers. A series of plastic explosives (PBXs) were prepared, based on four different nitramines, namely RDX (1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazinane), β‐HMX (β‐1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetrazocane), BCHMX (cis‐1,3,4,6‐tetranitro‐octahydroimidazo‐[4,5‐d]imidazole) and ε‐HNIW (ε‐2,4,6,8,10,12‐hexanitro‐2,4,6,8,10,12‐hexaazaisowurtzitane, ε‐CL‐20), bonded by the matrices mentioned. For comparison, pentaerythritol tetranitrate and certain commercial explosives based on it, Semtex 1A, Semtex 10 and Sprängdeg m/46, were used. Detonation velocities, sensitivities to impact and friction, and peak temperatures of thermal decomposition by differential thermal analysis technique (DTA) for all the explosives studied were determined. Heat of detonation was calculated by means of a thermodynamic calculation program (EXPLO 5 code). Fluoroelastomers have a neutral to positive effect on the thermal stability of nitramines and they have a significant effect on decreasing the friction sensitivity. However, their anti‐impact efficiency is the lowest in this study although they have a positive effect on performance of the corresponding PBXs. PA and PIB matrices markedly decrease thermal stability of nitramines, the anti‐impact influences of PIB‐binders are better than those of PA‐binders, while PA‐binders have a higher anti‐friction effect and slightly less negative influence on the performance of the PBXs in comparison with PIB mixtures. The polydimethyl‐siloxane matrix has a neutral effect on thermal stability of the nitramines studied, it has an influence on the volume thermochemistry of detonation comparable with that of fluoroelastomers although it does not provide comparable performance, and its corresponding PBXs have optimum sensitivity parameters.