Effect of different mechanical ventilation modes on patient-ventilator synchrony and diaphragm function in rabbit model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Abstract

Objective: To observe the effect of different modes of mechanical ventilation on patient-ventilator synchrony and diaphragm function in rabbits with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). Methods: Eighteen New Zealand rabbit models of ARDS were induced by intratracheal infusion hydrochloric acid until the oxygenation index (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) was less than 200 mmHg, and then divided into three groups with random number: assisted-controlled mechanical ventilation (A/C) group, pressure support ventilation (PSV) group and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) group. All of them were ventilated for four hours with the targeted tidal volume (V(T)) (6 ml/kg) and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrated with the maximum oxygenation method. Gas exchange, pulmonary mechanics and patient-ventilator synchrony were determined during 4 h of ventilation and the concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH) in diaphragm were measured after 4 h of ventilation. The q test was used for the multiple comparison of the sample mean. Results: There were no significant differences in PaO(2)/FiO(2) between three groups during ventilation 1-4 h (F=1.029, P>0.05). The V(T) in NAVA group was obviously lower than that in PSV group and the respiratory rate (RR) and the electrical activity of diaphragm(EAdi) were higher than those in A/C group(all P<0.05).The trigger delay and off cycle delay the in NAVA group were markedly lower than those in A/C and PSV group during ventilation 1-4 h(F=14.312, 9.342, both P<0.05). Asynchrony index in NAVA group (3.1%±1.0%) was obviously lower than those in A/C group (22.3%±5.2%) and PSV group(8.4%±2.3%) (F=7.192, P<0.05). In NAVA group, peak EAdi (EAdi(peak)) and peak airway pressure (Ppeak) were markedly correlated (r=0.97±0.16, P<0.05), while Ppeak delivery in A/C and PSV group was not correlated to EAdi(peak) (r=0.38±0.13,0.46±0.15, both P>0.05).Compared with A/C group, the concentration of MDA in the diaphragm in NAVA group was obviously lower(P<0.05). SOD and GSH level inthe diaphragm in NAVA group were both obviously higher than those in A/C group (both P<0.05). Conclusions: It is helpful to avoid eccentric contraction of diaphragm, lessen oxidative stress and alleviate ventilator-related diaphragm dysfunction by keeping spontaneous breathing as far as possible and subject-ventilator synchrony when ventilation in ARDS with NAVA.