Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of various levels of nanoparticles chromium picolinate on performance, egg quality, minerals retention, and tissues accumulation of layer chickens. This study used 54 seventy-week old post-molt laying hens randomly allocated into 0 (control), 500 ppb (µg kg-1) Cr and 3000 ppb Cr groups for a 60-day experiment. The chromium was nanosize (80.8 ± 2.7 nm) chromium picolinate (NanoCrPic) and each treatment was undertaken with six replicates. In the meantime, a total of 18 birds (1 bird/replicate) were used for metabolic experimentation. The results of the experiment indicated that there were no significant effects on body weight, feed intake, feed efficiency, and egg production of layers. Supplemental NanoCrPic could significantly (p < 0.05) improve egg quality, or retention of chromium and zinc, but decrease shell ratio in the 60th day eggs. The addition of NanoCrPic resulted in increased minerals accumulation in tissues such as Cr, Ca, and P concentration in the liver, Cr concentration in the yolk and Ca concentration in the eggshell. In conclusion, supplemental NanoCrPic improved Cr and Ca accumulation in the liver and egg, improved Zn and Mn retention in layer chickens.
Highlights
Chromium is an essential mineral element in humans and domestic animals (Lukaski, 1999)
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of various levels of nanoparticles chromium picolinate on performance, egg quality, minerals retention, and tissues accumulation of layer chickens
The chromium was nanosize (80.8 ± 2.7 nm) chromium picolinate (NanoCrPic) and each treatment was undertaken with six replicates
Summary
Chromium is an essential mineral element in humans and domestic animals (Lukaski, 1999). Trivalent chromium (Cr (III)) is associated with the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids and proteins in animals, it is term as “glucose tolerance factor (GTF)”, which regulates the metabolic action of insulin (Schwarz & Mertz, 1957; Chen et al, 2009). Different Cr (III) forms have diverse rates of absorption. Organic Cr (III) has greater biological availability than inorganic Cr (III) (NRC, 1997; Lukaski, 1999). Inorganic Cr (e.g. CrCl3) is in the range of 0.5-2% (Mertz, 1969); while organic Cr (e.g. CrPic) is in the range of 10-25% (Seerley, 1993)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
