Abstract
Knee braces are often used during rehabilitation after ACL injury. There are two main concepts, rigid and soft braces, but studies comparing the two show conflicting results. Most studies used movement tasks with low translational or rotational loads and did not provide joint kinematics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of two different knee braces (rigid vs. soft) on knee joint kinematics in ACL-deficient patients compared to an unbraced control condition using two tasks (walking and 180° cutting) provoking knee movements in the frontal and transverse planes. 17 subjects with ACL-deficient knees participated in this study. 3D knee joint kinematics were recorded. To provoke frontal plane knee joint motion a laterally tilting plate was applied during a walking task. Both braces reduced the maximum valgus angle compared to the unbraced condition, stabilizing the knee joint against excessive valgus motion. Yet, no differences in peak abduction angle between the two braces were found. However, a significant extension deficit was observed with the rigid brace. Moreover, both braces increased transverse plane RoM and peak internal rotation angle, with the effects being significantly larger with the rigid brace. These effects have been associated with decreased knee stability and unphysiological cartilage loading. Therefore, the soft brace seems to be able to limit peak abduction with a lesser impact on physiological gait compared to the rigid brace. The cutting task was selected to provoke transverse plane knee movement and large external knee rotation was expected. However, none of the braces was able to reduce peak external knee rotation. Again, an increase in transverse plane RoM was observed with both braces. Based on these results, no brace outmatched the other in the second task. This study was the first attempt to clarify the effect of brace design for the stabilization of the knee joint during movements with frontal and transverse plane loading. However, to provide physicians and patients with a comprehensive guideline for brace usage, future studies will have to extent these findings to other daily or sportive movement tasks.
Highlights
The knee joint is of great importance for human locomotion and is one of the most complex joints of the entire body (Tittel, 2003)
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of two different knee braces on knee joint kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient patients compared to an unbraced control condition using two tasks provoking knee movements in the frontal and transverse planes. 17 subjects with ACL-deficient knees participated in this study. 3D knee joint kinematics were recorded
An inverse kinematics approach using the multi-body model Dynamicus (Härtel and Hermsdorf, 2006) was used to calculate 3D knee angles as objective parameters suggested in the literature to be indicators for knee joint stability (Schrijvers et al, 2019)
Summary
The knee joint is of great importance for human locomotion and is one of the most complex joints of the entire body (Tittel, 2003). Its anatomy does not provide bony guidance for rotation and extreme translation between the tibia and femur; the ligamentous apparatus of the knee is very important, and vulnerable in these situations (Tittel, 2003). 200,000 ACL injuries occur each year in the United States (Woo et al, 2006b; Escamilla et al, 2012; Strutzenberger et al, 2012). Most of these injuries are caused by non-contact situations (Spindler and Wright, 2008; Levine et al, 2013), and females show a higher injury rate than males (Woo et al, 2006a; Spindler and Wright, 2008). ACL ruptures typically occur during movements with high knee valgus moments in combination with internal or external rotations of the tibia (Hughes and Watkins, 2006)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
