Abstract

The cuspal deflection of different composite resin restorations cured with different systems and restoring different cavity dimensions were investigated using a total 60 freshly extracted human maxillary premolars. These teeth were divided into three main equal groups, based upon the tested restorative materials. Group (I) used T-Econpm Plus, Group (A1) (II) used Filtek Z250 XT (A2), and Group (III) used Filtek P90 (A3). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups based upon the prepared cavity dimensions. Each subgroup was further subdivided into two groups whether cured with Halogen (C1), or LED (C2). MOD cavity with two different dimensions, each restorative material was packed according to the manufacturer's instructions and cured. Dye penetration technique was used and specimens were sectioned in mesiodistal direction and examined by stereomicroscope. Collected data was statistically analyzed. The result showed T-Econom plus had statistically significant higher microleakage value, while Filtek P90 had statistically significant lower microleakage value. There was no statistically significant difference between groups cured with Halogen and LED. It can be concluded that silorane based composite, LED curing system, and smaller cavity dimension could significantly decreased cuspal deflection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.