Abstract

Investigation of surface treatments to improve the bond of resin cements to metals may contribute to the longevity of metal ceramic restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin cement to nickel-chromium (NiCr) alloy. Eighty cast NiCr alloy disks (9 × 3 mm) were divided into 8 groups (n=10), which received 1 of the following surface treatments: 1) 50 µm Al(2)O(3) particles + silane; 2) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) + silane; 3) 30 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Cojet Sand) + silane; 4) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) followed by 110 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Rocatec) + silane; 5) 50 µm Al(2)O(3) + metal primer; 6) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) + metal primer; 7) 30 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Cojet Sand) + metal primer; and 8) 120 µm Al(2)O(3) followed by 110 µm silica-modified Al(2)O(3) (Rocatec) + metal primer. The silane was RelyX Ceramic Primer and the metal primer Alloy Primer. RelyX ARC resin cement was bonded to NiCr alloy surfaces. Specimens were thermally cycled before shear mode testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05). Failure mode was determined with a stereomicroscope (×20). The results revealed that surface treatment was significant (P<.001). There was no significant difference between 50 µm and 120 µm Al(2)O(3) particles, regardless of the bonding agent used (silane or metal primer). Cojet Sand provided lower SBS than Rocatec, both in the groups treated with silane (P<.001) and metal primer (P<.01). No significant difference was observed between silane and metal primer in the groups abraded with 50 µm and 120 µm Al(2)O(3) particles. Metal primer decreased the SBS of both Cojet Sand and Rocatec groups (P<.001). Rocatec + silane had the highest SBS and Cojet Sand + metal primer the lowest. All groups presented 100% adhesive failure. Particle size influenced SBS only in the groups abraded with silica-modified Al(2)O(3). The bonding agent did not affect SBS in the groups abraded with Al(2)O(3). Alloy Primer was not chemically compatible with silica-modified Al(2)O(3). Both mechanical (particle size) and chemical (silica/silane interaction) factors contributed to the high SBS of Rocatec + silane.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.