Abstract

IntroductionThis study compared the tubular density and push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) to dentin in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. MethodsTen extracted single-rooted human teeth from diabetic and nondiabetic patients (n = 5 in each group) were decoronated, prepared up to a #5 Gates-Glidden drill, and sectioned horizontally at the midroot area to prepare 3 dentin slices, each measuring 2 mm in thickness (1 slice for the push-out test and 2 slices for the tubular density test). MTA was prepared and packed into the root canal space followed by incubation for 3 days. The push-out bond strength values were determined using a universal testing machine. Specimens were viewed under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope to determine the failure types at the cement-dentin interface. Ten slice specimens in each group were evaluated under SEM at 3 different sites to determine the tubular density. Comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05). ResultsDiabetic patients exhibited significantly lower push-out bond strength of MTA to root canal dentin (P < .05). The pattern of failure at the MTA-dentin interface was different between the 2 groups. The tubular density was significantly higher in diabetic patients (P < .05). ConclusionsThe dentin in diabetic patients exhibited different physicochemical properties. The failure patterns and modes in diabetic patients might be explained by the changes in the push-out bond strength, the calcification mechanism of the dentin-pulp complex, a higher dentinal tubule density, and less peritubular dentin. These differences could explain the higher failure rate of root canal treatment in these patients.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.