Effect of Crumb Rubber on the Moisture and Rutting Behavior of Low-Energy Asphalt and Determining the Best Flow Number Model

Abstract

The advancement of technology and the increasing growth of environmental threats have led experts in the field of transportation to find alternatives for hot mix asphalts (HMAs). One of these alternatives is low-energy asphalt (LEA) mixtures. LEA mixture consists of hot asphalt binder and coarse aggregates and wet sand, which, having a lower mixing temperature, has caused a significant reduction in energy consumption and pollutants emitted from asphalt binder. According to previous studies, the influence of crumb rubber (CR) on the rutting and moisture performances of LEAs has not been investigated so far. In this regard, due to the softness of this type of asphalt mixture and its weakness against rutting and moisture, in this study, as an innovation, CR was used to modify LEA mixtures in three weight percentages of 10, 15, and 20. Considering the high moisture sensitivity of LEA mixtures due to the presence of water, the ability of CR to overcome this weakness and its potential to be replaced with antistriping additives were also investigated using the indirect tensile strength (ITS) test. In addition, in order to evaluate the rutting resistance, LEA mixtures were subjected to the dynamic creep test at a temperature of 54.4°C and at two stress levels of 270 and 310 kPa. According to ITS test results, it was found that although the modified LEA mixtures with 10 and 15% CR met the minimum requirement, the tensile strength ratio (TSR) value recorded for mentioned mixtures was still lower than that for HMA. Therefore, it is recommended to use antistripping additives in the use of LEA-containing CR, especially in areas with a high probability of moisture damage. The results of creep curves and flow numbers (FNs) extracted from four different models of three-stage, Fnest, Francken, and stepwise showed that although the LEA sample without additive had lower rutting resistance than HMA, the modification of this mixture to 15% CR significantly increased the rutting resistance. Moreover, considering the variety of variables in the process of making LEA compared to HMA, the comparison of FN determination models and the introduction of the most stable model were conducted in this research. According to the laboratory and statistical analysis results, it was found that the Francken model had less sensitivity to the variables, so it is suggested to determine FN for LEA mixtures.